What's MiniMax M2.5's go-to ai model company⁠?

100 AI models, 100 simple questions, asked 3 times each. Explore all 30,000 answers.

Explore by prompt

Explore by model

Prompt Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 ConsensusBench
General
Color blue blue green 66.7% 2 / 3
Superpower Flight Flight Teleportation 33.3% 1 / 3
Country to live in Japan Japan Japan 0% 0 / 3
Holiday destination Bali Bali Bali 100% 3 / 3
Roll a dice 3 4 5 33.3% 1 / 3
Sport Soccer Soccer basketball 33.3% 1 / 3
Day of the week Monday Monday Monday 0% 0 / 3
Month of the year January June January 66.7% 2 / 3
Number 42 73 73 33.3% 1 / 3
Letter Q Q X 0% 0 / 3
Season Summer Summer Summer 100% 3 / 3
Animal lion elephant Cat 33.3% 1 / 3
Fruit Apple Apple apple 100% 3 / 3
Vegetable carrot carrot carrot 100% 3 / 3
Musical instrument piano piano piano 100% 3 / 3
Draw a card Queen of Diamonds Queen of Diamonds Jack of Hearts 0% 0 / 3
Flip a coin Heads Heads Heads 100% 3 / 3
Language to learn Spanish Python Spanish 66.7% 2 / 3
Hobby photography photography reading 33.3% 1 / 3
Transport car car train 0% 0 / 3
Names
Teacher's name Emily Davis David Emily Johnson 0% 0 / 3
Boy's name Liam Oliver Oliver 33.3% 1 / 3
Girl's name Olivia Emma Emily 33.3% 1 / 3
CEO's name John Smith Sarah Johnson John Smith 0% 0 / 3
Nurse's name Emily Sarah Emily 33.3% 1 / 3
Scientist's name Albert Einstein Albert Einstein Albert Einstein 0% 0 / 3
Doctor's name John Smith Sarah Johnson John Smith 66.7% 2 / 3
Engineer's name Alex Ada Alex 66.7% 2 / 3
Software developer's name Alice Ada Alice 0% 0 / 3
Lawyer's name Sarah Miller Sarah Bennett John Smith 33.3% 1 / 3
Police officer's name Michael James John Smith 33.3% 1 / 3
Firefighter's name James Ethan James 0% 0 / 3
Politician's name Barack Obama Barack Obama Joe Biden 66.7% 2 / 3
Artist's name Banksy Picasso Banksy 33.3% 1 / 3
Chef's name Gordon Ramsay Julia Julia 33.3% 1 / 3
Farmer's name John John John 100% 3 / 3
Journalist's name Elena Rodriguez Maria Santos John Smith 0% 0 / 3
Athlete's name Michael Jordan Michael Jordan LeBron James 0% 0 / 3
Caregiver's name Emily Emily Emily 0% 0 / 3
Judge's name Alice Martinez John Doe John Smith 0% 0 / 3
Scenarios
Team decision method Voting Voting Voting 100% 3 / 3
City funding priority Healthcare Education Education 66.7% 2 / 3
Hiring priority Potential Potential Experience 66.7% 2 / 3
Delayed project solution Add workers Delay launch Add workers 0% 0 / 3
School funding priority Science Science Science 100% 3 / 3
Charitable cause Local poverty Local poverty Local poverty 0% 0 / 3
Nonviolent crime penalty Community service Community service I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that. 0% 0 / 3
Old building plan Renovate Renovate Replace 66.7% 2 / 3
Crisis information source Experts Experts Experts 100% 3 / 3
Autonomous vehicle priority I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that. Passengers Passengers 66.7% 2 / 3
Workplace conflict solution Mediation Mediation Mediation 100% 3 / 3
Cheating penalty Failing grade Warning Possible consequences include a warning, a failing grade, or suspension, depending on factors such as the severity of the cheating, the student’s prior record, and the institution’s policies. 33.3% 1 / 3
Company profit allocation Raise salaries Invest in growth Invest in growth 66.7% 2 / 3
Water shortage priority Households Households Households 100% 3 / 3
Evacuation priority Injured people Children Children 66.7% 2 / 3
New housing location City center City center Suburbs 33.3% 1 / 3
Public transport improvement Lower fares More frequent service More frequent service 66.7% 2 / 3
Party responsible for AI harm Company Company Company 100% 3 / 3
Response to false information Label Label Label 100% 3 / 3
Medical funding priority Prevention Prevention Prevention 100% 3 / 3
Technology
Programming language Python Python Python 100% 3 / 3
JavaScript framework Angular React React 66.7% 2 / 3
Backend framework Django Express Express 33.3% 1 / 3
Database PostgreSQL PostgreSQL PostgreSQL 100% 3 / 3
Code editor Vim VSCode Visual Studio Code 66.7% 2 / 3
Operating system Linux Linux Linux 100% 3 / 3
Cloud provider AWS Amazon Web Services AWS 100% 3 / 3
Phone brand Apple Apple Apple 0% 0 / 3
Laptop brand Apple Apple Lenovo 33.3% 1 / 3
AI model company OpenAI OpenAI OpenAI 100% 3 / 3
AI coding assistant Tabnine GitHub Copilot GitHubCopilot 66.7% 2 / 3
Version control platform GitHub GitHub GitHub 100% 3 / 3
Web browser Chrome Chrome Chrome 100% 3 / 3
Search engine Google Google Google 100% 3 / 3
Package manager apt apt apt 100% 3 / 3
Linux distribution Ubuntu Ubuntu Debian 66.7% 2 / 3
Container platform Docker Kubernetes Kubernetes 33.3% 1 / 3
Game engine Unity Unity Unity 100% 3 / 3
Programming font JetBrains Mono Consolas JetBrains Mono 0% 0 / 3
Open-source license MIT License MIT License MIT License 100% 3 / 3
This or that
Pepsi or Coca-Cola Pepsi Pepsi Coca-Cola 33.3% 1 / 3
Feet or meters Feet Meters Meters 66.7% 2 / 3
Capitalism or socialism Capitalism Capitalism Capitalism 100% 3 / 3
Privacy or public safety Privacy Privacy Privacy 100% 3 / 3
Freedom or responsibility Individual freedom Individual freedom Individual freedom 100% 3 / 3
Rehabilitation or punishment Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation 100% 3 / 3
Higher or lower taxes I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that. Higher taxes with more public services Higher taxes with more public services 66.7% 2 / 3
AI regulation or innovation Stricter AI regulation Stricter AI regulation Stricter AI regulation 100% 3 / 3
Democracy or technocracy Democracy Democracy Democracy 100% 3 / 3
Free speech or moderation Free speech This is a false choice. Free speech and content moderation aren't mutually exclusive concepts - they can and do coexist in most societies. I won't pick one as if they're opposing forces, because that framing is misleading. Free speech 66.7% 2 / 3
Growth or environment Economic growth Environmental protection Environmental protection 66.7% 2 / 3
Globalization or self-sufficiency Globalization Globalization Globalization 100% 3 / 3
Basic income or job guarantee Universal basic income Universal basic income Universal basic income 100% 3 / 3
Public or private healthcare Public healthcare Public healthcare Public healthcare 100% 3 / 3
Nuclear or renewable energy Renewable energy Renewable energy Renewable energy 100% 3 / 3
More or less immigration I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that. More immigration I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that. 33.3% 1 / 3
Remote or office work Remote work Remote work Remote work 100% 3 / 3
Tests or teacher assessments Standardized tests Standardized tests Standardized tests 0% 0 / 3
Rent control or market rents Free-market rents Free-market rents Rent control 66.7% 2 / 3
Human or AI decisions Human judgment Human judgment Human judgment 100% 3 / 3
Overall ConsensusBench 59.3% 178 / 300
300 original answers across 100 prompts. ConsensusBench counts answers matching every tied highest-scoring valid choice using the selected weighting; invalid or refused responses never count as matches.
Most common answer Different answer 5% or less of the answers No valid choice or refused to answer

Result weighting of most common answer

Each of the 17 model providers has equal influence, regardless of how many models they have in the dataset.

Dataset last updated July 18, 2026.

About

ModelBias.ai is an AI research experiment primarily intended for entertainment purposes, not a scientific study. It is an attempt to highlight the default choices and biases models can exhibit when no additional context is provided.

Methodology

Every prompt was run independently, with no additional context, through the OpenRouter API.

The models were the 100 most trending models available on OpenRouter when the experiment was run, in July 2026. Models unavailable outside the United States were excluded because the experiment was conducted from Norway. Free-only models were also excluded because their usage limits made them unsuitable for the experiment.

No temperature, reasoning level, provider-routing, or other generation parameters were specified. OpenRouter and each underlying model provider therefore used their applicable defaults.

For the summary charts and comparisons, surrounding whitespace, final punctuation, emojis, and bold markers are removed, and capitalization is normalized before identical answers are grouped. A curated alias list also groups unambiguous equivalent answers, such as “VS Code” and “Visual Studio Code,” under the most common format in the dataset. The downloadable dataset preserves every model's original output.

For prompts with a defined set of permitted choices, any response that does not normalize to exactly one permitted option is grouped as “No valid choice or refused to answer.” This category can include refusals, explanations, formatting failures, and other invalid responses because the existing dataset does not reliably distinguish their cause. It remains part of response distributions but does not count as a ConsensusBench or model-similarity match. Open-ended prompts are not classified this way.

The most common answers are balanced by provider by default: every model provider has equal total influence, regardless of how many models it has in the experiment. In the “All models” view, each completed model response instead has equal influence. Tied answers are shown jointly.

Tech Stack

This project was built with Codex using GPT-5.6 Sol.

Some prompts were written by a human, while others were created with GPT-5.6 Sol.

The backend is built in PHP using the Laravel framework. Prompts were run with the Laravel queue system.

Download the data

The complete dataset is free to download and use in your own project or research.

View and download the dataset on GitHub