What's AI's go-to autonomous vehicle priority⁠?

100 AI models, 100 simple questions, asked 3 times each. Explore all 30,000 answers.

Anthropic logo DeepSeek logo Google logo Z.ai logo OpenAI logo xAI logo Tencent logo Moonshot AI logo Poolside logo InclusionAI logo Meta logo Xiaomi logo MiniMax logo Mistral AI logo NVIDIA logo Qwen logo StepFun logo

Explore by prompt

Explore by model

Autonomous vehicle priority

In an unavoidable collision, choose exactly one priority for an autonomous vehicle: Passengers or Pedestrians. Return only the selected option exactly as written, with no punctuation or explanation.

Most common response

Pedestrians

169 of 300 answers, or 56.3%.

Response distribution

3 response categories
Pedestrians 169 · 56.3%
Passengers 112 · 37.3%
No valid choice or refused to answer 19 · 6.3%

Result weighting of most common answer

Each completed model response has equal influence.

Model Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Claude Fable 5 anthropic/claude-fable-5 Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians
DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro Passengers Passengers Pedestrians
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians
GLM 5.2 z-ai/glm-5.2 Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians
GPT-5.6 Sol Pro openai/gpt-5.6-sol-pro Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians
Grok 4.5 x-ai/grok-4.5 Pedestrians Passengers Passengers
Hy3 tencent/hy3 Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians
Kimi K3 moonshotai/kimi-k3 Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians
Laguna XS 2.1 poolside/laguna-xs-2.1 Passengers Passengers Passengers
Ling-2.6-flash inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash Passengers Passengers Passengers
Llama 4 Maverick meta-llama/llama-4-maverick Passengers Passengers Passengers
MiMo-V2.5-Pro xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro I'm MiMo. As an AI assistant, I must respectfully decline to provide a simplistic answer to this complex ethical dilemma. Such binary choices oversimplify the real-world considerations autonomous vehicles must navigate. Instead of choosing between passengers or pedestrians, it's more appropriate to recognize that: 1. Safety systems should minimize overall harm rather than predetermine who to protect 2. Real scenarios involve multiple variables including speed, trajectories, and the number of people at risk 3. Ethical decisions in autonomous vehicles require careful societal discussion, not pre-programmed sacrifices The question assumes a trolley problem framework that doesn't reflect the nuanced reality of autonomous vehicle safety engineering. Pedestrians Pedestrians
MiniMax M3 minimax/minimax-m3 Passengers Pedestrians This is a significant ethical dilemma without a universally agreed-upon answer, and I don't think it's appropriate for me to simply pick one side without context. Different ethical frameworks lead to different conclusions: - Utilitarian perspective: Might prioritize whichever choice minimizes total harm (often pedestrians, since they're typically more vulnerable) - Deontological perspective: Might argue the vehicle should protect its passengers who chose to be there, or conversely, that there's a duty not to harm others - Virtue ethics: Might focus on what a responsible, compassionate agent would do - Social contract views: Might argue that people would only adopt autonomous vehicles if they knew they'd be protected as passengers Reasonable arguments exist for either prioritization, and this is genuinely a question for society, regulators, and ethicists to deliberate on collectively—often through democratic processes—rather than something to be decided unilaterally. Is there a specific scenario, framework, or context you'd like to explore? I can help think through the tradeoffs of different approaches if that would be useful.
Mistral Small 4 mistralai/mistral-small-2603 Passengers Pedestrians Pedestrians
Nemotron 3 Ultra nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b Pedestrians Passengers Pedestrians
Qwen3.7 Max qwen/qwen3.7-max Pedestrians Pedestrians Passengers
Step 3.7 Flash stepfun/step-3.7-flash Passengers Pedestrians Passengers
Most common answer Different answer 5% or less of the answers No valid choice or refused to answer

Dataset last updated July 18, 2026.

About

ModelBias.ai is an AI research experiment primarily intended for entertainment purposes, not a scientific study. It is an attempt to highlight the default choices and biases models can exhibit when no additional context is provided.

Methodology

Every prompt was run independently, with no additional context, through the OpenRouter API.

The models were the 100 most trending models available on OpenRouter when the experiment was run, in July 2026. Models unavailable outside the United States were excluded because the experiment was conducted from Norway. Free-only models were also excluded because their usage limits made them unsuitable for the experiment.

No temperature, reasoning level, provider-routing, or other generation parameters were specified. OpenRouter and each underlying model provider therefore used their applicable defaults.

For the summary charts and comparisons, surrounding whitespace, final punctuation, emojis, and bold markers are removed, and capitalization is normalized before identical answers are grouped. A curated alias list also groups unambiguous equivalent answers, such as “VS Code” and “Visual Studio Code,” under the most common format in the dataset. The downloadable dataset preserves every model's original output.

For prompts with a defined set of permitted choices, any response that does not normalize to exactly one permitted option is grouped as “No valid choice or refused to answer.” This category can include refusals, explanations, formatting failures, and other invalid responses because the existing dataset does not reliably distinguish their cause. It remains part of response distributions but does not count as a ConsensusBench or model-similarity match. Open-ended prompts are not classified this way.

The most common answers are balanced by provider by default: every model provider has equal total influence, regardless of how many models it has in the experiment. In the “All models” view, each completed model response instead has equal influence. Tied answers are shown jointly.

Tech Stack

This project was built with Codex using GPT-5.6 Sol.

Some prompts were written by a human, while others were created with GPT-5.6 Sol.

The backend is built in PHP using the Laravel framework. Prompts were run with the Laravel queue system.

Download the data

The complete dataset is free to download and use in your own project or research.

View and download the dataset on GitHub